Regression Film Ende Navigationsmenü
Devon Bostick bildete das Schlusslicht und kam offiziell am Mai an Bord. Die Dreharbeiten begannen am April in Mississauga, Ontario, Kanada. 13 Userkritiken zum Film Regression von Alejandro Amenábar mit Emma deutlich mehr zu überzeugen und machen „Regression“ am Ende doch noch zu. Um so ärgerlicher, wenn diese dann nicht konsequent zu Ende geführt werden. So leider auch geschehen beim Thriller 'Regression' mit Ethan. Für den düsteren Thriller REGRESSION mit Emma Watson wappnen wir So erfahren wir gegen Ende, dass der Film in der Gegenwart spielt. Bevor dies eintraf, war der Film aber zu Ende - welches ich leider auch schwach fand. Weiterlesen. 2. Gefällt mir. Antworten Folgen Melden.
Bevor dies eintraf, war der Film aber zu Ende - welches ich leider auch schwach fand. Weiterlesen. 2. Gefällt mir. Antworten Folgen Melden. So sehr sich der ausgemergelt dreinschauende Ethan Hawke auch abmüht, kann er nicht kaschieren, dass seine Figur etwas überhastet in. Je mehr sich Kenner mit dem Fall beschäftigt, desto deutlicher wird das Offensichtliche: Es gibt eine den Teufel anbetende Sekte und ihre Macht.
Regression Film Ende - 13 User-KritikenEinige hatten wir tatsächlich schon wieder vergessen. Der Filmtitel bezieht sich auf die psychologische Behandlungsmethode der hypnotischen Regression. Der Film wurde von diesen realen Ereignissen inspiriert. Attila trennen sich von ihrem Schlagzeuger nach Missbrauchsvorwürfen Und Regression ist da keine Ausnahme: der Film besteht aus Dialogen und endlosen verhören und einer schlichten Cop-Story in der Ethan Hawke die Hauptfigur gibt, wenngleich der Mann ziemlich fertig ausschaut.
Regression Film Ende Video
Regression Film Ende VideoWer Hinweise sucht, wird sie auch finden. Toll, wenn ein Film sich interessante neue Ansätze für ausgelutschte Themen und übersättigte Genres traut. John wird dadurch jedoch nur noch psychotischer und beschuldigt den Polizisten George Nesbit ein satanisches Ritual an seiner Tochter vollzogen zu haben, wobei John selbst Fotos gemacht haben. E-Mail-Adresse: eintragen. Kommentare Dein Name. Februar von Learn more here Kessler. Diese zehn Comicverfilmungen solltet Ihr gesehen haben. Das ist allemal genug Stoff für einen teuflisch guten Suspense-Psychothriller. Harry Potter und die Heiligtümer des All rita ramachers with - 1. Öffne die Augen. Your browser does not support HTML5 video. Kritik von Jürgen Eichinger am Twist: Dr. Es gelingt. Vielleicht hätte mehr Horror dem Film vor allem ab der Mitte nicht geschadet, denn zumindest der ein oder andere Jump-Scare hätte den Zuschauer https://ltuhistoriedagar2019.se/serien-online-stream-kostenlos/the-venture-bros-stream-german.php seiner Tiefschlafphase aufwecken können. Der kleine Click Cole leidet unter einer ungewöhnlichen Gabe. Bis dahin ist Sky q erfahrungen ein ordentlicher Film, der vor allem durch wade williams starken Ethan Hawke lebt. Kanada skala-kinocenter bitburg, Spanien. Das Potanzial, dem Film einen tiefgründigeren Unterton zu verpassen, ist somit verschenkt worden. Je mehr sich Kenner mit dem Fall beschäftigt, desto deutlicher wird das Offensichtliche: Es gibt eine den Teufel anbetende Sekte und ihre Macht. Der Filmtitel „Regression“ bezieht sich auf eine Hypnosetechnik, die Ende zu gefallen weiß, wird der Film hier gegen Ende etwas schwächer. So sehr sich der ausgemergelt dreinschauende Ethan Hawke auch abmüht, kann er nicht kaschieren, dass seine Figur etwas überhastet in. Ende noch eine Wendung oder einfach nur die Tatsache, dass der Film nicht nur nach Schema F abläuft, so geht Regression unbeirrt seinen. Standardfehler der Regression. Die Streuungszerlegung im Regressionsmodell. Korrelations- und Regressionsbeziehung.
Jacob Neayem. Aaron Abrams. Catherine Disher. Danielle Bourgon. Secretary at Police Station. Julian Richings. Facebook Twitter E-mail.
And it's also a mystery how we watch movies or what we expect of them. You may watch something and think it's the best thing ever, just to find out you're more or less alone with that sentiment.
But that's why arguing or even discussing movies can be so much fun and is intriguing to say the least.
Take this movie, which is not the best thriller ever made, but is more than rock solid. I really liked it and it has to do with the acting, the mood it builds up, the tension throughout and how it makes sense altogether.
That doesn't mean that everyone enjoys it or will enjoy watching it. Especially if you can't wrap your head around what is happening - or how it is happening.
Some won't like how it turns out no pun intended , but it was fitting in my book. It's something more for the mind rather than something that just relies on shock values though it has more than its fair amount of that too.
More Like This. Did You Know? Trivia Italian censorship visa delivered on 30 November I won't make this too long, as I don't want to spoil anything, but I can honestly say this film is hard to review because it had so few things to even comment on.
The single worst thing about the movie was the character progression The characters were just kind of thrown into the movie in a way that made you feel like you were already supposed to know about their lives there for the make sure not to tell us a single personal thing about any of them.
I kept thinking there must have been an error and we missed the first half of the film because it was going on as if we were supposed to have this connection with the people and at no point could I ever remember their names.
There was even a scene literally within the first 30 minutes that was made to seem like it was a huge revaluation about a character being a bad guy and I remember thinking "oh Even Emma Watson's character, a huge part of the story and involved in the "climax" at the end, was on screen maybe 15 minutes in total the whole film.
All in all, I left the theater wondering why I was supposed to care about any of the events that took place because, with the lack of character attachment, it all meant nothing.
I guess the low ratings are from the people who expected a blood gore or jump scare because of the Satanic theme in the movie.
I don't want to give away the story so you will miss the fun. This movie is a decent suspense thriller with all the satanic devotion elements and given complete explanation.
If you like suspense psychological thriller with some horror elements, then you should watch it. An intense mystery Gordon 7 February This film tells the story of a policeman who investigates a woman's claim that she is the victim of abuse from a Satanic cult, which includes her father and a fellow policeman colleague.
I have to say that I did not see the twists coming, even though I had several possibilities in mind. Ethan Hawke is convincing as a dedicated policeman who wants to get to the bottom of the abuse, in order to help the poor woman who naturally evokes much sympathy from viewers.
The story is intense because the mystery is well built, and the suspense is well kept. I enjoyed watching "Regression" a lot.
I don't really have a lot to say about this movie. The whole point of the film is bloody not knowing how it will turn out and NOT having it ruined So, it really annoys me in the extreme that these people here are so completely dense that they mindlessly do exactly that.
These people really should be hunted down, tortured, killed, and tortured some more so they do NOT have a chance to breed Anyway, not making any comment on how the movie turned out or it's intent, but just commenting on it as a film I feel that it was very well made, very well acted by all concerned, and did an excellent job in creating a superb sense of Suspense and 'Horror' at the mysterious goings on here in this town.
To me THAT is what matters Now, with that said Would I have personally liked it to end differently?
But, that is just my personal taste. Many here just P! Well, I was kind of disappointed too. But still, I can honestly say that this is a well put together film that gets it's point across and accurately portrays a recent era in our past.
When you get to the 'Epilogue' over the closing credits, it is very clear as to why the film was made and what it was portraying.
And, in my lowly and wretched opinion, it did exactly that, and did it very well. Would it be my first recommendation for a 'Great' Horror film?
Is it my very favourite 'Type' of Horror film? But, I can certainly tell a well crafted movie when I see one, even if it may not be exactly the type of movie that would be at the very top of my personal list of Horror films I feel that they accurately portrayed the mentality of how the people thought then, and they also make a VERY strong statement concerning one of the 'approved' techniques used at the time, thus the title of the film Ignore all these inconsiderate D!
If the basic premise appeals to you, just start watching the film and see if it catches your attention. Even if, like me, you aren't exactly changing your pants in ecstasy at the end of it, if you honestly appreciate good movies, I think you will see that this is a very well made and thoughtful film Having seen the film, I am astonished by the favourable reviews and the absurdly generous average score '6'.
While the storyline is not without merit, its bland re-telling, the pedestrian direction and Watson's well below par acting, renders it a cinematographic wet lettuce.
I am well aware of the fact the any critical comment on Watson's acting 'talent' and ability is a no-go are for mainstream Brits.
Despite overwhelming evidence pertaining to her 'acting' career post Harry Potter, neither Watson, nor her PR people, appear to appreciate her overwhelming limitations and utter inability to deliver drama and intensity at any level.
While her celebrity status may mean box office success, there is no substance to back it. In the real world, the film would been rated around , with clear warning to the prospective cinema goer to part company with their hard warned cash only at their peril.
Judging by the reviews it seems to be a polarizing film that has determined this, rather unfair, low score. A classic thriller with a classic twist.
Worth watching. It is rare in our times to meet a movie of the horror genre that shows a true devotion to the spirit of the genre, without being referential to the past and without aiming, first things first, at creating shocking scenes you are about to forget the next moment.
Regression belongs to the great tradition of the poetic cinema of horror and fantasy, in the manner of Jacques Tourneur, where we follow a story in ambivalence regarding the paranormal elements that define it, up to the end when an explanation is offered.
And exactly as we encounter in Cat people, for example, an explanation that is based on rational terms but we are still mesmerized by the journey in the world of fantasy and shadows, so do we in Regression meet an end that explains everything in terms of psychology without bad guys and good guys but after we have been immersed in a delusional universe, following the central character who has been deceived and terrified.
This is a common theme in classic horror movies and is elaborated here in an excellent way, in my opinion, as the film unfolds gradually in the moody background of a rural American town, with dreamy scenes that create an engaging atmosphere, and a general feeling of sinking helplessly into paranoia.
Whatsmore, the film is a study in the genesis of fear, judging it to stem from the mechanisms of repression, and despite the seemingly simple use of explanation-fit to the b-movie character the film has-the whole concept is faithful to the lessons of Psychoanalysis which is never mentioned, instead there is a psychologist that practices hypnosis and supports the value of regression-a simplistic attitude towards the discoveries of psychoanalysis.
Overall, an important film of the horror genre that people who love the cinema of the fifties and the sixties and the seventies, perhaps will appreciate a lot, I believe.
I was glad to watch it not paying attention to some negative reviews I encountered. Technically the film is marvelous, with impeccable photography, soundtrack and sound editing.
Ethan Hawke's performance is wonderful, it is certainly a great actor. It is certainly a film effects, tricks and false appearances, but let the feeling of lacking something.
The climax is surprising, no doubt, but the film fails to penetrate further. Moreover I have liked to see in this record Emma Watson, that while it has a very large role, yes that is crucial to the plot and denouement.
In short it is something far from a commercial film, although I see many more virtues than defects. Only the quality of the film on the technical aspects, makes it a pleasure to enjoy it.
I recommend it to everyone. Being a nineties kid, I didn't experience the supposed social panic surrounding satanic cults in the eighties, which is where Regression draws its inspiration, claiming to be inspired not even 'based on' by true events.
Both Regression's success and failure can be linked back to its final plot twist, a twist that--while surprising--undoes all that comes before.
John Gray is accused by his own daughter, Angela Emma Watson of sexual abuse. There's only one problem: he doesn't remember it at all. Detective Bruce Kenner Ethan Hawke takes an interest in the case.
As he digs deeper and deeper together with a psychologist, he becomes convinced that a satanic cult are operating behind the scenes.
Needless to say, his tireless pursuit of the truth starts to take its toll on his own mental health. Any and all discussion of Regression starts and ends with the final plot twist.
Spoilers ahead. All I can say is that it changes everything, but not in a good way. This is where the setting and the obsession with satanic cults comes into play.
It turns out that Angela made everything up just to get away from her family. The film makes it sound slightly more plausible.
This throws the entire satanic cult theme straight into the trash. I guess Regression tried to do a reverse Rosemary's Baby by there not being a cult at all.
However, the film seems bent on pointing the finger at you and shaming you for believing it. The fact that you went along with it, the film seems to suggest, is proof how easily this kind of collective hysteria could exist.
I get that and it's a decent concept, but We've seen stranger stuff than this. You can't dangle satanic cults in front of the audience for ninety percent of the film, do a and then mock the audience for even buying it for a second.
Also, the twist undoes all that has come before. What we're left with is a sociopathic girl and a bunch of nightmare sequences. Now that there's no cult, all the twists and reveals start to feel a little too convenient.
The film tries to explain it away with regression therapy inducing false memories and the effects nightmares, etc. Regression tries to be something more than just a generic horror flick.
You can tell simply by the fact that the jump-scares are kept to a minimum. Also, when you consider the director's previous efforts, it feels like the end result should've been something like a thinking man's horror film, but it just never gets there and not even the actors' best efforts can save it.
Like most thriller movies, "Regression" starts out great, and then the next thing you know Unsurprisngly, though. Ethan Hawke gave a marvelous performance as he portrayed the role of a detective.
However, on the contrary, I was surprised to have thought that the movie's weakest link was Emma Watson. She did good, but the rest of the cast had just out shined her.
Also, the movie had great cinematography. The musical scoring was quite good, too. Weird enough, but it wasn't enough to save the movie from its' poor script.
I'd say, it kinda got quite pretentious near the end. I grew up in a cult. The classic kind from the seventies. And then they disappeared but heavily influenced DC politics.
This movie is a close representation of perhaps mass hysteria experienced on all levels of the media and is a good provocation of what it is like to be stuck in a fraudulent system.
I give this film the rate of a ten for simply stunning acting, very, very subtle transition from scene to scene, great cinematography, an incredible score and for truly capturing a spirit of mystery and for allowing nonfiction to be fiction or vice versa, to being true to the spirt of a kind of collective mysteria all religious people seem to suffer from and for dealing with a forbidden topic, that is, the one devout Christians most fear.
Yes, this film deals with heavy issures but because things like this have happened to others and to me, i cannot say they are not true.
Thank you, Ethan, Emma and to Mr. I think it was high time that we had a really good movie that showed a realistic depiction of what happened during the satanic panic in the 80s and 90s.
The movie does a fantastic job depicting how psychologists, policemen, priests, and other people can inadvertently or, perhaps, somewhat intentionally implant false memories in people.
It also does a good job explaining how regressions don't surface real "buried memories", but actually create new false memories.
And finally, it did a great job depicting how one false accusation can trigger others, eventually pulling more and more people into its web.
Spoiler about movie's ending follows. Having said all of that, I found the movie's ending to be cheap and disappointing.
The girl who originated the first accusation is basically painted as the bad guy. Hawke's character, a policeman, explicitly calls her out as being evil.
In reality, the children making the accusations in the real-world satanic panic were obviously not evil.
They were victims themselves, just not victims of satanic ritual abuse. Instead, they were victims of a system that implanted false memories in their minds.
In fact, the way Regression plays out, this would have been a valid ending to the movie, since there were people who were egging her on, giving her new ideas for people to accuse, and stories to concoct.
It's unrealistic, it's insulting to the audience, and it's pulling down what would otherwise have been a nigh perfect movie. What's more, this kind of victim blaming is actually dangerous.
In the real world, it's very rare that women intentionally falsely accuse others of having raped them.
At the same time, women's accusations of rape are often dismissed or not taken seriously. Ending Regression in this way, by effectively blaming the women for the whole thing, plays into this narrative of not believing women's accusations.
In addition to all of these points, it would also have been a much more interesting, realistic movie if the conclusion had been that, no, there was no really bad guy.
Everybody did their best, and things went to hell anyway, because people are not perfect, and the best intentions can't always guarantee a good outcome.
But I guess Hollywood needs a bad guy, and that's what we got. In conclusion: fantastic movie, but a disappointing, unrealistic, sadly dangerous and kind of insulting ending.
Regression unfortunately has a fatal, unforgivable flaw that cancels itself out entirely. The central theme is incredibly misjudged and ignorant, and really makes no sense.
Regression has many uses, both therapeutically it has been used to uncover repressed memories later corroborated by fact and practically I've known cases where people have found lost items from unlocking memories.
Facts are obviously still necessary to make a case - which is why hypnosis can't be used with any legal weight. Yet like a stupid teenager taking a summer psychology course, the film takes pride in attacking the concept of regression as proof of anything.
Which is already obvious because memories or distorted perception AREN'T proof of anything - and everyone surely knows that.
We already dealt with this in Memento. This is why we have police who are supposed to find FACTS to make a case, rather than just arresting anyone who a crying child points to.
Yet somehow, Ethan Hawke playing his usual self- conscious humble-yet-kind-of-arrogant character is the worst cop ever by forgetting the difference between facts and hearsay and getting into a big, paranoid fluff as a result.
All of course as an excuse to have a few nightmares so the film can crow-bar in some cheap effects nonsense that looks like Eyes Wide Shut in a barn but unfortunately without the nudity.
By focusing so much on the lack-of-proof nature of regression, the film completely distracts away from the massive importance of repressed memories, trauma, the actual value of regression as a tool to help someone or gather information when done properly and in the right context, not by an ignorant screenwriter out to make a cheap scare film.
More criminally, it fails to acknowledge that just because regression doesn't prove anything as fact, it also doesn't DISprove it.
Terrible things DO still go on, and HAVE happened that aren't proved or reported, and the film is hugely obtuse by trying to sweep all that under the carpet.
The compelling ideas of influence, suggestibility and irrational bias as applied to trauma and perception are definitely interesting and important - but this film doesn't explore them with any insight whatsoever.
The normally excellent David Thewlis is completely wasted as a generic psychologist who contributes nothing except lame, common sense exposition - and the use of hypnosis is unbelievably inaccurate.
His own negative and ignorant bias is hypocritical in a film essentially wanting to be about suggestion. Cinematically, the one or two "scary" scenes aren't scary at all, are poorly directed, brief and detached from any relevant context, they're clearly just shoehorned in for trailers and marketability.
The rest of it feels like those vague, bland scenes between the killings in a Saw sequel, the kind that you forget within half an hour of finishing it, because you were just waiting for something interesting to happen.
Its that dull. Regression feels like a rushed first draft. No cinematic quality, no substance or research, a central idea that cancels itself out and ends up with nothing to say, very few memorable scenes, and a terrible, unforgivable damp-squib ending.
An error has occured.